A team trains the same network on the same data several times, changing only the learning-rate schedule. Every run uses warmup, then cosine decay:
Here are the runs so far:
| run | peak rate | warmup | what happened |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 0.006 | none: starts at the peak | loss exploded to NaN at step 12 |
| B | 0.006 | 250 steps | trained cleanly all the way to step 30,000 |
| C | 0.008 | 250 steps | loss fell normally, then exploded to NaN at step 213 |
| D | 0.008 | 1,000 steps | loss fell normally, then exploded to NaN at step 850 |
A teammate reads Runs A and B as proof that warmup cures these explosions, and proposes Run E: peak 0.008, with the warmup stretched to 2,000 steps.
What does the evidence predict for Run E?
Select all that apply.